Scenic Shores Neighborhood Association

Annual Meeting - October 3, 2015

Resolved Issues:

Lake dredging.
Installation of safety wall in center of Jacksboro Highway bridge.
TXDot Mess on Jacksboro Highway
Casino Beach Traffic on Watercress - Casino Beach Project cancelled.

Issues Underway:

1) Love Circle Park Revitalization

Completed park cleanup (batting cages, derelict buildings, etc.)
Installed irrigation and planted 65 trees in Jan 2014. Planted 120 trees in 2015.
Funding secured in 2015 for improvements (jogging trail, etc.). Work scheduled to begin in 2016.

No playground / shelter / parking – maintain the site as a passive use open space / naturalized area
No trail encroachment into the forested area at the south end of the park
Light levels can be easily modified so that just enough illumination can be provided to observe activity in the park without creating a lighted parking lot’ effect.
Park encircled with cabling for reduced access to motorized vehicles.

2) Bike Trails

Phase I construction from end of Trinity Trails in River Oaks (e.g. “Burger’s Lake”) to Arrow S Park will begin August 2016.

General estimate of completion of trail around the lake is 2018 to 2019.

3) Water & Sewer

Love Circle (and Surfside) - Design complete. Water and sewer installation in Spring of 2016

Watercress (e.g. Peninsula Club Circle, Island View, etc) - Fort Worth has completed installation of water main. Fort Worth is waiting to connect residents until resolution of Town of Lakeside dispute with Fort Worth over annexation of the Ella Young Addition. Sewer installation estimated to begin in 2018.

4) Jacksboro Highway Corridor Annexation

Fort Worth is 3 years into the process of annexing the area. Currently, Fort Worth is suing Lakeside for a preemptive illegal annexation. Fort Worth expects to complete annexation in 2016.

5) Sunset Park and Peninsula Club Preservation

More work needs to be done to finding agreement between neighbors to create action plan.

6) Crime Fighting Efforts - Working toward a comprehensive plan.

Coordinated Security Plan for Lake Worth

(Working Document - being discussed by other three NA’s)

Purpose of plan: To implement a set of achievable, measurable, and economically feasible goals to enhance the security and safety for lake residents and lake guests.

Security issues: In addition to crime issues common to the entire city, the lake experiences an additional layer of issues. These issues include the vandalism and dumping issues to the extensive park properties, theft of water-specific equipment such as boats and tackle, drowning and injury from lake use, and the increase of all types of crime due to the numerous guests who visit the lake. These issues not only affect the residents of the lake but also the guests who wish to enjoy the lake. For the safety of all citizens, the security in and around the lake is critically important.

Solutions:

Unify park hours around lake - The FWPD has requested that all parks around Lake Worth share the same hours. In its current hodgepodge state of widely varying opening and closing times, policing the park hours is difficult if not impossible by beat patrols. By having all lake parks enjoy the same hours, policing the park hours becomes an efficient and doable task.

Evaluation of infrastructure - Each neighborhood needs to evaluate its infrastructure for needed additions and/or repairs. Infrastructure improvements would include:

Fencing / cabling - Fencing and cabling could be used in a variety of ways including discouraging lake guests from infringing on private property, reduce illegal dumping, and to control traffic damage to natural areas.

Park hours signage - Clearly marked park hours will help policing of the area and reduce undesirable activities which could result in injury or crime.

“On lake” and park location markers - Clearly marked “location signs” would help guests and residents communicate with law enforcement as to the specific location needing service. Location markers would be put in strategic locations in and around the lake.

New park infrastructure - New park improvements should be considered in locations heavily used by the public but which currently lack adequate infrastructure for such use. Proper infrastructure reduces environmental damage and promotes safety.

Evaluation of policing resources - The Fort Worth city government currently expends policing resources for the security of lake residents and lake guests. A fresh evaluation of these resources could result in more efficient use of resources and a corresponding increase in security.

Issue 1: Two police beats - The lake currently is broken into two police beats. Each beat covers not only the lake but also wide swaths of the city.

Issue 2: Lake Marshal - A “lake marshal” currently offices on the shoreline. Once funded by land leases, the lake marshal now finds itself with little or no revenue since the leased land has been sold to lake residents. Moreover, the Marshal’s authority for patrol has waxed and waned between patrolling only the water, to patrolling the land and water, to not patrolling at all.

Issue 3: Confusion in policing - Given the fact that the lake is separated from the main portion of the City of Fort Worth by several communities as well its general rural setting, policing has suffered from confusion. Emergency 911 calls frequently are routed to the wrong municipalities and police frequently cannot find addresses.

Unify policing resources for a “lake beat” - By having a single “lake beat,” issues occurring around the lake can be addressed by a single unified patrol rather than a divided one. This would increase the efficiency of finding addresses as well as understanding patrol issues unique to the lake.

Unify land / water lake patrol - Many policing issues cannot be neatly divided between “water” and “land.” For example, theft, drowning, and safety issues frequently move from shore to lake to shore. Allocate the property equipment and trained personnel to address the issues unique to the lake.

Schedule policing for peak guest times - Like other specific areas of the city, the lake attracts a large number of guests. Allocating resources during peak visiting times would save resources by applying them when needed most. Given the seasonal and weekly nature of the lake’s guests, patrolling primarily should be scheduled for warmer months, weekends, and holidays. Normal residential levels of patrolling should be adequate when fewer guests are at the lake.

Improve communication between police and neighborhood members - Create a better strategy for 911 callers to identify their locations.

Promote home safety practices of individual residents - Lake residents would be encouraged to add “strategic security layers” to protect themselves including:

Lighting

Signs

Fencing

Locking and securing property

Alarms

Cameras

Promote neighborhood-wide safety strategies - Neighborhood associations could engage in neighborhood-wide strategies for increasing their security including:

Neighborhood signage

Neighborhood watch strategies

Educate neighbors on security

Encourage neighbors to report crime

Neighborhood communication